Talk:Miss Brill

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Short story Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text

So, it seems like a lot of people are similarly dissatisfied with the writing here. I'm gonna try to fix it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.140.105.16 (talk) 12:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the text because it can be retrieved with the external link, and adding the text is not a guideline of the WikiProject Novels (short story task force).Zigzig20s 10:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

08:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Nightblade52== text ==

sorry to say, but the little bit of information in this article doen't even touch the surface of this story. It doesn't hit on the fact that she does what she does because she is extreamly lonely, or anything else.

Nightblade52

I agree. The article doesn't even touch on the deep motifs of the story. I'm a senior in high school and our AP lit class hit on so much more in the novel. For example, the fur around her neck mimmics the same emotions as she does through the story. This article would only help organize the thoughts of someone who had previously read the story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.28.94 (talk) 03:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is an interpretation and it would have to be referenced. Please feel free to add it if you can find a reference from a book of literary criticism.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic Style?

The article needs some serious revision; it reads like something written by a high school freshman. My main problem is this section under "Plot":

"On her way home, a typical Sunday would involve the purchase of cake at the bakery, but instead she went home into her own dark room. As she quickly put her fur back in its box, she hears a cry, this cry is Miss Brill. The reason why the story says, "she thinks she hears a cry"[7] is because Miss Brill does not want to accept that she is the one crying, or accept herself for that matter. Mansfield's personification throughout the passage reveals a sense of loneliness belonging to Miss Brill for she not only fabricates a connection with the other park goers, but also personifies her inanimate piece of clothing by conversing with it as well as feeling for it."

Structures like "the reason is because" and plain grammatical mistakes are distracting and incorrect. I am afraid any revisions I make will be reversed; an experienced editor needs to go through and edit it for encyclopedic style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.81.77 (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to try improving it yourself. Use an edit summary explaining what you are doing, and include in it "See talk page". I do suggest that you not make the plot summary any longer than it already is as some editors dislike lengthy plot sections. You could break it into paragraphs however.-gadfium 20:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the paragraphs. I see someone did try to rewrite the section last month, but they first blanked it, which is not acceptable, and then they gave their own impressions of the writing style and included no references, which was enough for an automated reversal of the edit.-gadfium 20:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss Brill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110916041739/http://cle.ens-lyon.fr/56709178/0/fiche___pagelibre/%26RH%3DCLE_ANG110100 to http://cle.ens-lyon.fr/56709178/0/fiche___pagelibre/%26RH%3DCLE_ANG110100

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]