Talk:Miss South Carolina Teen USA

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Miss South Carolina Teen USA article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Beauty Pageants

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Miss Teen USA Special Awards#Miss Congeniality|Miss Congeniality]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

Wikipedia is usually great but it has lost some credibility in my opinion by deleting any reference to the national news story of her by now famous response during the pageant. I'm all for preventing vandalism but to not mention the incident at all makes the entire article inaccurate by what it DOESN'T say.

At least start a page under her name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.103.20 (talk) 05:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs to develop into a story about the youtube phenomenon with this young lady. It is unacceptable to protect this page when millions are hitting to it to simply build a story. Is tarnishing her reputation with the truth "vandalism"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.210.230.14 (talk) 03:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

of course its been vandalized. there has GOT to be at least a blurb about it... 100% of this pages visitors now are searching for information. get to it. 72.174.2.252 07:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Gained notoriety following her answer to the final question, which was criticized as "strange" and "grammarless". Videos of her response were posted to YouTube and garnered three million views.[2]"

I think you should better say "millions of views" instead of "three million views", because there are thousands of people watching this video every day and so giving a specific number here is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.58.172.176 (talk) 07:53, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Morgan Smith links to an unrelated article - remove this link! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.155.169.121 (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]