Talk:Missile guidance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

laser vs mechanical inertial guidance

The section on inertial guidance says that ring laser gyros like those used in private aircraft are less accurate than the mechanical systems in ICBMs. It's not clear to me from reading this whether this is specifically talking about Big Deal (TM) military-grade mechanical gyros vs cheap off-the-shelf laser hardware, or if it's comparing the two in general and just giving examples. The source is a book I don't have on hand. I feel like either way it would be clearer with an adjective or two. Anyone agree? 204.194.77.3 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

resolution

changed resolution link to Angular resolution. plase change if there is a better place to link it to. STHayden ^{[ Talk ]} 11:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

command off line of sight

The command off line of sight paragraph needs some fixing. B. P. Battaglia (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

main reference

I have inserted a well-known reference about missile guidance. This is Zarchan's book. Maybe some mathematical parts should be introduced being this standard material. --Pra1998 (talk) 08:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No history?

I'm rather curious of the history of guided missiles but this page lacks a history section. Shouldn't it have one? 78.147.107.88 (talk) 18:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Go ahead punk (talk) 12:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

difference between preset and inertial guidance

can someone explain the difference between preset and inertial guidance?--Arado (talk) 12:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A torpedo can be preset to travel in a certain direction, or even travel for a certain period and then turn, but if it takes inertial guidance to compensate for unanticipated water currents that could otherwise drag it off target. Hcobb (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Missile guidance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070109230625/http://www.army.mod.uk/linkedfiles/royalartillery/units/royal_school_of_artillery/bst_handout_f02.pdf to http://www.army.mod.uk/linkedfiles/royalartillery/units/royal_school_of_artillery/bst_handout_f02.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]