Talk:Mixcraft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia has plenty of products listed on the site. Why is it being considered spam? I was asked to add an article for Mixcraft as a project for my class. What can I do to make sure it is not spam? Thanks for your time.

This article contains loaded words which impart bias. Descriptors should be revised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.231.70.144 (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like an ad

I like mixcraft a lot, but this reads like a product promo poster. Like it was written by mixcraft, to sell mixcraft. Punkonjunk (talk) 06:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Version Number

The latest version listed here is 5.2, however on the official website it is listed as version 6. Which is correct? Jjoeshaw (talk) 17:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mixcraft3Screenshot.jpg

Image:Mixcraft3Screenshot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "Awards" Section

I would like to propose removing the "Awards" section altogether due to the advertisement nature of the article and the fact that it promotes the product. QuickWhitt7 (Talk/Contribs) 21:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]