Talk:Miz Mam'selle Hepzibah

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A more appropriate picture

If no one objects, I'm going to replace the pictures. These were actually drawn by Chuck Jones, and Walt Kelly was angry he'd redrawn her fact to be more human. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 07:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redrawn her "face". Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 07:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name designation

She is always referred to as "Miz" in the strip, never "Miss". I think the title heading for this entry should be changed to reflect that. User: Rackinfrackin 23:10, 8 September 2009

Yep. The tiniest concern is that few people are going to guess that "Miss" is spelled that way. It would be a bigger concern if it was likely searchers get the spelling of "Mam'selle Hepzibah" correct. Change away, I say. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 08:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mamselle4.jpg

Image:Mamselle4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hum, yes. Well. Sigh. I didn't add that image, but I did go to a little effort to add the other, existing image (and the fair use rationale) to draw a comparison between the original and what Kelly found objectionable. Should I find a link to a site that continues to violate fair usage, which seems a little contrary to the exercise?

Think what I'm going to do here is contact Kelly Studios and ask them what to do.

Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did write to them in May, explaining the situation, and giving the link to Wiki article, but have not had a reply. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continuity error

Just thought I'd mention that the gift Porky had inadvertently tied to his finger (a box containing a bouquet butterflies) is seperate from the gift he gave to Hepzibah (a small cactus). --Threyon (talk) 19:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]