Talk:Monocle (brand)

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

jmd2017 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Monocle on their behalf.

.

Some proposed changes

Some factual updates have been made including citations and references. Factual updates include new areas of the Monocle business that have launched, but hadn't been updated on the page.

{{UserboxCOI |1= In September 2015, Monocle launched The Monocle Minute - a free daily email bulletin of news, opinions and opportunities for subscribers. |2= Monocle Retail |3= In October 2015, Monocle launched The Kioskafé - a magazine shop and coffee bar. Modelled on European city kiosks, it sells over 300 magazines ranging from art, design, fashion, culture and more. Situated outside London's Paddington station, the space was opened as a place devoted to great independent magazines with the number of independent newsagents in decline [25]. |4= In 2015, Monocle launched its first Quality of Life conference in Lisbon, followed by Vienna in April 2016. The Quality of Life Conference aims to bring together leading voices from the worlds of design, urbanism and culture[28] over three days situated in different cities annually.

Fair use rationale for Image:Monocle magazine November 2007.jpg

Image:Monocle magazine November 2007.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Circulation

Could we please add some circulation figures for this item.

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=46702&c=1

17 February 2011

Four years after launch we today had a first ABC circulation figure for stylish current affairs monthly Monocle of 63,007.

Of these just over 10,700 were on the UK newsstand while 2,000 were from UK subscriptions. Some 9,700 of Monocle's total came from bulk copies and 41,981 of its paid-for sale was overseas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.184.24.90 (talk) 16:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lifestyle magazine?

Am I the only one who thinks this is more of a serious international affairs magazine and less of a "lifestyle" magazine (where one would expect advice on successful dieting perhaps tips on losing weight) The name needs to be changed from Monocle (Lifestyle magazine) to Monocle (international affairs magazine), or simply Monocle (magazine). And the price for the magazine does not belong in the lede -A1candidate (talk) 23:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think "lifestyle magazine" is a euphemism for "guide-to-shopping magazine": what clothes to be wearing, which expensive hotels to stay at, how to justify to yourself possession of a car with a large engine, etc etc. Similar stuff makes up a large percentage of the advertising pages in the New Yorker, say, but not much of its editorial pages. I rarely look at Monocle, but when I do I'm struck by the way that so much of its (seemingly) editorial pages show me how to spend more of my money. I'd prefer "Monocle (shopping magazine)", but the current title seems a reasonable compromise. -- Hoary (talk) 01:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changing of Description

Monocle propose changing the description from Monocle (lifestyle magazine) to Monocle (media company) as the brand now incorporates commerce, radio and television. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monoclemag (talk • contribs) 08:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page-rename makes sense, and (media company) does seem to be an established naming convention. I'll wait for 24 hours, for other editors to chime in, before renaming. –Quiddity (talk) 16:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The magazine in question has nothing to do with health and lifetstyle and shouldn't be labelled as such -A1candidate (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this is a media company, not a magazine. There is a separate page for the magazine somewhere although fairly sparse. -Arthurmingard (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there is not a separate page for the magazine - the Monocle magazine is covered entirely here. (The hatnote at the top of the page, points to an article about a different magazine with the same title). –Quiddity (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page move/rename Done. –Quiddity (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Monocle (media company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120627223302/http://themagaziner.com:80/2011/01/monocle-on-bloomberg-debuts-tomorrow/ to http://themagaziner.com/2011/01/monocle-on-bloomberg-debuts-tomorrow/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monocle (UK magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129093242/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-04-07/world/most.livable.cities_1_livability-health-care-cities?_s=PM:WORLD to http://articles.cnn.com/2010-04-07/world/most.livable.cities_1_livability-health-care-cities?_s=PM:WORLD

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would have removed a large content in the body because of its promotional tone, especially if you read the "Website" section. But I went here instead and propose that the website section, and other texts with a promotional language, be removed. Would that be possible? AmberBeer84 (talk) 09:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]