Talk:Mossley Hill
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Hi Fastily,
Can you tell me why you believe that the edit I made was unconstructive please? There were many issues with previous version as per wikipedia guidleines:-
- lack of supporting references to back up the information thus the info provided lacked credibility
- First sub heading of 'Description' is ambiguous and contains info that is better split over more precise sub headings
The version I have provided has at least made an attempt to begin to tackle these and also contains additional information.
Best regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.129.228 (talk) 19:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mossley Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070705082741/http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/Images/tcm21-29272.pdf to http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/Images/tcm21-29272.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004100517/http://liverpoolstreetgallery.com/thumbnails.php?album=24 to http://liverpoolstreetgallery.com/thumbnails.php?album=24
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)