Talk:Motorola Defy

HSPA+

According to Motorola Tech Specs (http://developer.motorola.com/products/defy/) the Defy does not have HSPA+. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vendrizi (talk • contribs) 16:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Dual band UMTS with HSPA+/HSUPA (..900/2100 MHz in Europe,..)" are mentioned under 'Compatible networks', but in the opening paragraph, Optus is mentioned for Australia, which too is the 900/2100 MHz bands. No dout New Zealand and Thailand also use these too. These need to be edited in, perhaps only needing to exclude Europe from 850 MHz (if that's the case).

According to the TI OMAP article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omap) the OMAP3610 processor has no PowerVR-chip, according to the info-programs on my device is has a PowerVR SGX530. Does someone know where the info about the OMAP3610 in the defy comes from?

TI OMAP3610 or 30

I've changed the processor info in the info-box back to OMAP3610, per the official specifications. (Not sure about whether tweets constitute a valid reference, either way I changed the reference to the spec page on Motodev) There's been a lot of disagreement over what processor the Defy has. As far as I'm aware, the general consensus is that it is, as Motorola claims, an OMAP3610 but with the graphics chip the 3630 uses. As the article develops, it might be worth noting the supposed discrepancy, but I think at this point it's best we provide the official info, rather than speculation. NaN135709 (talk) 17:37, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Android version

Is there already an update to 2.2 available in the US? In Europe Motorola is planning to offer the update from 2.1 in Q2 --91.20.147.60 (talk) 08:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.52.57 (talk) 03:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP67?

There's no mention of the Defy's IP67 rating on any of Motorola's sites, and Motorola carefully avoids the word "waterproof," using "water resistant" instead. Since there's no reliable source that confirms the IP67 rating (tech blogs don't count), it should be treated as a rumour, not as a fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.52.57 (talk) 20:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The official German user manual from Motorola says that the product has or exceeds the protection level IP67, on page 75. --Neitram (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note how the german manual avoids claiming that the Defy is IP 67 certified. Same in other manuals in different languages: not a word about the device being IP 67 certified, just that it matched the specs, with a disclaimer about Motorola reserving the right to change the specs after printing the manual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.52.57 (talk) 03:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move Request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request and consensus. - GTBacchus^(talk) 04:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Motorola DEFY → Motorola Defy – per WP:ALLCAPS. 「gu1dry」⊤ • ¢ 01:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. As per WP:ALLCAPS and WP:MOSTM. --DAJF (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Common name. Marcus Qwertyus 21:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per MOS:TM. Jenks24 (talk) 07:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Motorola Defy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Motorola Defy RED II.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]