Talk:Municipal annexation in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

What's going to be the standard for including cities here?[edit]

It seems to me that just about every US city has annexed some territory since they were first chartered. Jon 22:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Only a partial answer, but I'd suppose some research into some of the more unusual cases in the US - the massive historical expansion of Los Angeles, Houston, Phoenix and Chicago; or the fairly well-studied process institutionalized for cities in North Carolina (David Rusk's Cities Without Borders gives the NC cities a detailed look, and Mike Davis' City Of Quartz does the same for L.A.). Offhand, those spring to mind for various reasons - the empire-building aspects of L.A. and Chicago's historic annexations, and the very unusual annexation legal philosophy in NC... Davidals 06:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
There's a difference between annexing unincorporated territory and consuming other political entities. --Belg4mit 04:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Dillon[edit]

Umm, what the heck is the point of the introduction? --Belg4mit 04:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand the point of the rest of the article, either. --Beirne (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Annexation vs. consolidation?[edit]

See histories of Jacksonville, Florida, Nashville, Tennessee, Miami, Florida, Melbourne, Florida, Honolulu, Hawaii, Houston, Texas, Juneau, Alaska, and Lexington, Kentucky. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Shoestring annexation merger[edit]

This Article Has Major Issues[edit]

If this article is about "municipal annexation," then it seriously needs to begin by focusing on just what "municipal annexation is"...that is, the process by which a city legally incorporates areas into it. There needs to be a discussion about "growth" and "services."

It is clear that the "shoestring annexation" merger didn't go well. We have a lot of examples of unusual annexation, but little or no discussion of regular annexation. The second section is fine, but where's the first section?Ryoung122 16:59, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Municipal annexation in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)