Jump to content

Talk:My Beauty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Kevin Rowland-My Beauty.jpg

[edit]

Image:Kevin Rowland-My Beauty.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So is Springsteen a whining homophobe, or what?

[edit]

From our article:

The album was supposed to have 12 tracks, but the song "Thunder Road" (written by Bruce Springsteen) was pulled from the album at the last minute due to Springsteen not approving to the lyrical re-writes done by Rowland. The promo CD distributed (to radio/press) prior to the official album did have all twelve tracks.

It would be really great if we could get into the lyrical changes, into the why of Springsteen's objection. Kevin's version (as found on YouTube) is hardly a "re-write"; it's mostly faithful (in fact, at first I thought perhaps Springsteen was objecting to an assortment of more-singable synonyms), but near the end, Rowland adds a few lines, perhaps a whole new verse, which seems to indicate he is talking to a young man, not a woman. I think that is the soul of Springsteen's objection; is there any evidence to the contrary?

I think, if Springsteen literally prevented this cover version from official release (when some dozen artists have covered it already), he's got something to answer for: Are you that homophobic, Bruce? Are you that fearful, that you can't allow your song to be re-interpreted as a sexy/romantic thing between two young men? I mean, how lame is THAT?

Does Springsteen have a history of not-so-gay-friendly moves? (I'm more sympathetic to the don't-change-my-lyrics-at-ALL school of thought, perssonally, but I don't think Bruce has a history of that.)

And incidentally, our "Thunder Road" article merely lists Rowland as one of the artists who have covered the song. If this topic is better addressed there, that's well and fine with me.

--Ben Culture (talk) 10:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very late answer (seven years later), but according to Kevin Rowland himself:
“That’s another myth, that Springsteen turned my version down,” says Rowland. The truth, he says, is that nobody at Creation bothered to get it to the Boss in time. Now, with Springsteen’s management’s approval, the album can be heard as was originally intended.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/jul/21/kevin-rowland-interview-dexys-midnight-runners-covid-19-my-beauty-dress-stockings
Heath 128.173.42.61 (talk) 14:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on My Beauty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]