Talk:Mycobacterium marinum

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Mycobacterium marinum be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

[Untitled]

created a redirect here from: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fish_tank_granuloma&redirect=no

References in the article

At least some of the references in this article (apart from being in the wrong format) are attributed wrongly, i.e. the numbers don't tie up. Probably needs an expert to sort this out... Smalljim 10:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree that the references have been done out of format and confusing. I tagged the article with a cleanup tag; I don't have time to do it right now. Matt.leeck (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Internal infections???

I would REALLY appreciate some information on possible internal infections caused by use of (washed) kitchen utensils in cleaning infected fish tank supplies. 172.191.235.97 00:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add an image of M. marinum infection?

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=marinum%20infection&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

plagarism?

" ... as M. marinum is a very common atypical mycobacterium causing skin infection (70). " The (70) at the end of this sentence looks like an inline citation to reference number 70 - suggesting that the sentence has been pasted. I haven't found the source. Seventy references would be many for an article - suggesting that the source may be a book. Aa77zz (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the history and now understand - self plagarism. The article was started by a Pieter Stragier (Pstragier) using his Master's Thesis. Reference 70 was: Wolinsky, E. 1992. Mycobacterial diseases other than tuberculosis . Clin Inf Dis 15:1-12. Aa77zz (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007122699932459. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]