Talk:Nacra F18 Infusion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nacra F18 Infusion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sailing Low‑importance

	Nacra F18 Infusion is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Improving the article

It would be good to include the Mk.I to Mk.III changes that the Infusion went through into the article. ZeroXero (talk) 21:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would be good, but we need reliable sources to cite. Have any? - Ahunt (talk) 21:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I implemented the above I researched the changes. Sailboat data is a terrible source it good for background research but shouldn't really be a primary reference. I just started reading your content taken from there and it is wrong. Nacra is an american brand "performance catamarans" that was rescued by the dutch importers who brought all the rights and chased the F18 market for example. Most of the technical content is actually driven by the Formula 18 rules not the class. So writing stuff like made of epoxy and made of vinylester is confusing. The article also didn't really reflect the change of the design. Sorry I posted the change then saw the editors conflict box.

Wiki has whipped a big update I did of the referencing. I will look at it tomorrow. Yachty4000 (talk) 00:27, 13 Sept 2023 (UTC)

I am trying to fix and make sense of your changes, but you keep removing sourced text and adding unsourced text, plus leaving existing sourced text without sources. To declare sourced text wrong you will need a new source that supports those claims. For now I will just tag your unsourced additions. - Ahunt (talk) 23:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay the article is a total mess now of broken refs, poor spelling, coding and grammar. I'm just going to let you keep going until you are done here and we can see what is left and what needs doing to fix it, so please leave a note here when you are finished. - Ahunt (talk) 01:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]