Talk:Namahn

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 May 2008. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

I think Namahn is a notable company according to the WP:CORP: it has been the specific subject of coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.

Namahn is arguably the top user-centered design agency in Belgium, and an active participant in national and international conferences, lectures, workshops and publications in the field of usability and information architecture.

A quick Google search will bring up written publications (e.g. [1], a lecture series with an accompanying published audio interview series with notable speakers in the field (amongst others Alex Wright of the New York Times, Chris Johnson of the University of Glasgow, Yvonne Rogers of Open University, Stephen Payne of the University of Manchester, Erik Stolterman of the Indiana University School of Informatics, etc.), seeding of the Brussels Pecha Kucha, mentions on various websites, etc.

The article is a stub without controversial content. All assertions are properly sourced. I do work at the company, but I'm completely prepared to not touch the article again and leave it to be improved by others. Mvuijlst (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Namahn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130125111731/http://www.higroup.com/home to http://www.higroup.com/home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]