Talk:NanoHealth

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2015.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Large claims

The wording of this article could use some work. It makes some really big claims without backing them up. To fix them they need to be toned down and cited with reliable sources, or else removed. Here are the sentences in question:

"It became famous" -- By who's standards and where?
"NanoHealth has received universal acclaim and recognition" -- Universal acclaim?
"NanoHealth was widely covered in the Indian and international media." -- I'm not sure the scope of coverage really belongs in a subsection. It'd be better to use those news sources to cite things that have been said about NanoHealth and fit it into the rest of the article.

The rest of the article also has problems with it's tone coming off as too much like an advert. Articles should be written from a Neutral Point of View.

Opencooper (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]