Talk:National Parks Board

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:NParks Logo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:NParks Logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 18 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page reads like it was written by the National Parks Board

I just corrected a line in the first paragraph of the article to read "...the backbone of the City in a Garden" rather than "...the backbone of our City in a Garden". Reading further, there are several sentences (e.g. the last sentence of the second paragraph, "Enhancing competencies of the industry will support Singapore’s vision of being a City in a Garden") which do not fit Wikipedia's style guide, and appear to be written from the perspective of NParks. Antermon (talk) 01:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...that's because most of it was copied directly from NParks' website back in 2012. I've removed the offending copyright violations, though that means there's nearly nothing left. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 04:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Parks Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140226042253/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-nparks-ceo-appointed/991942.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-nparks-ceo-appointed/991942.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]