Talk:Nationalization of oil supplies

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program.

POV issues

This article is written in a somewhat negative tone. It mentions the disadvantages of nationalization but not any benefits. While I am not necessarily an advocate of public ownership of oil reserves, the article should at least mention the good points of such a policy. --Eastlaw (talk) 04:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix or mention here phrases which you feel are negative in tone. Also, please mention here or in the article the aspects of the topic that are missing. NJGW (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was that the coverage here seems unbalanced. I don't object to mentioning the disadvantages of nationalization, but this article doesn't really mention A) the rationale behind why a government would nationalize petroleum and B) whatever alleged benefits, whether real or illusory, would come from such a policy. --Eastlaw (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I had spun this article off of another article that was bloated, so any help in fixing it would be appreciated. I'm going to change the tag to "unbalanced" to reflect the actual issue (that the present language is OK, but another view needs to be expressed better). NJGW (talk) 14:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peace justice and environmental reasons may predominate the decision to nationalize (US) oil supplies in the future. For the latter, see http://www.theguardian.com/environment/true-north/2014/dec/03/want-a-green-energy-future-nationalize-canadas-oil-industry. For peace and justice, I cite two items. First, note the relation between oil and war:

If US oil was nationalized, we would not start a war in the Ukraine, we would keep all the gas here, the price would stay low due to the big supply, home heating oil would say cheap, we would need to import less oil, the general price of oil would go down causing a boost to jobs by making our factories cheaper to run, we would spend less on military hardware by not making war…. on and on in a positive spiral instead of the negative spiral that we are in now.

Second, oil companies have perpetrated RICO-style fraud on the world by their coordinated denials of the harmful effects of their product, using tactics similar to the Tobacco Companies. Hypergrove (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

School project edits

In the next few days this page will soon get a significant revision and subsequent editing from students participating in the Public Policy Initiative. This article was chosen because it is missing content or sourcing and has been relatively innactive. Their draft articles are being formed in their user space and will be transfered here. Links to the drafts can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Courses/Political Economy of Technology and Science fall 2010. I will not be allowing students to that first initial transfer unless their article has been significantly improved in references and content. Please provide comments on the significant revisions and help the students improve the Wikipedia formatting. However, I would greatly appreciate that any major content changes be suggested to the students on the talk page so that they get the experience editing collaboratively and through consensus and feedback. The final date for the project is Friday December 10, expect significant editing from now until then. Thank you.

If you have any questions feel free to raise them here or on my talk page, Myself and other WP:Online Ambassadors will be monitoring their edits, so we will also be able to help fix issues on the pages, Sadads (talk) 01:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks nicely fleshed out. I fixed some glaring style issues and moved a few sections around. After a very quick glance, I would suggest trying to tone down economic jargon and shortening some of the section titles (tighter phrases). More could be done on the content, but this is an amazing leap forward for this article. 24.216.225.123 (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina 2012

YPF of Argentina and Repsol must be here now--Feroang (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nationalization of oil supplies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nationalization of oil supplies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427020042/http://www.thedeal.com/content/energy/ypf-expropriation-endorsed-by-argentine-senate.php to http://www.thedeal.com/content/energy/ypf-expropriation-endorsed-by-argentine-senate.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]