Jump to content

Talk:New Jersey Route 57

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew Jersey Route 57 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 57/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Between the end of the first paragraph and the second (in the "route description" section), "Past this intersection" is used twice, and in total "intersection" appears three times within 2 sentences. It felt redundant as I read it, so could you try rephrasing?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Only one issue caught my attention, otherwise this looks like a nice article. JamieS93 be kind to newcomers 23:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
     DoneJuliancolton | Talk 23:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I've now passed this as a GA, thanks Julian. JamieS93 be kind to newcomers 23:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speed limits

[edit]

The speed limits really shouldn't be in the article; it makes it really monotonous and is not interesting to the general public. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I included the speed limits in several articles as I thought it would be informative to the reader. Dough4872 (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The average reader probably would not care, and it makes the article very monotonous. --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)`[reply]
I have removed the speed limits. Dough4872 (talk) 15:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 57. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]