Talk:New Media Technology College

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Hypermedia7 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blanking

In a recent series of edits, an IP/anon editor (80.111.106.242) has largely blanked the article. Including the lead and cited information on the subject's establishment and disestablishment. With, in the one case where an edit summary was provided, a claim that content was "unsubstantiated" and "biased". In terms of the "unsubstantiated" claim, I do not see how this can be asserted. When the content is supported by otherwise reliable and mainstream news sources (Irish Independent and Irish Examiner) and is therefore very much "substantiated". In terms of the "bias" claim, given that the article (in its original promotional form) was created and expanded by apparent COI/SPA accounts, the claim of "bias" can only (IMO) be read as "I don't like that this less than promotional content is now also included". A push for removal of content that the contributor doesn't like. Ideally the removing editor would explain (here and as suggested) why and how these news sources (and the content they support) can be considered "unsubstantiated" or "biased". Guliolopez (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]