Talk:Nisbets

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nisbets article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 22 August 2012 by reviewer Adjwilley (talk · contribs).

Bristol Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite[edit]

I've started a rewrite of the page to bring this in line with the guidelines. I have rewritten the 'History' section completely, which was previously not in line with standards and used bullet-point form, which is not standard. I have also added references throughout, but may return and add more information and detail, etc, when I have time. Happy to chat / discuss on all fronts, as ever. Let me know. ScepticalChymist (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've gone in today, and rewritten the bottom section of the page. I have added additional references and removed the advertorial language, which appears to have been taken directly from the company's website. I think this is everything for now from me. I'll leave the issues flag on the article for a week or so to encourage some discussion. Sure it can be tightened up in places. Happy to chat / discuss on all fronts, as ever. Let me know. ScepticalChymist (talk) 12:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Following the last update, I have now removed the Issues flag. Happy to chat / discuss on all fronts, as ever. Let me know. ScepticalChymist (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement[edit]

Reads like an advertisement for the company from start to finish. In fact, the main contributors LinkedIn page states that his job, while working for this company, was to write this Wikipedia article. 109.76.40.86 (talk) 21:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]