Talk:Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah

India: Delhi Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in July 2020.

Religion: Interfaith Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clarification on All religion

provide clarification on all religion! please it for the most part is some pantheistic hindu and shia muslims. sunnis dont visit it christians dont, buddhist dont jain dont, parsi dont. 72.93.107.15 (talk) 04:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 04:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chistia reference

I just undid a reference to the Ajmer Sharif website - it's not really on topic, and it was put in incorrectly, so the choices were fix or delete, I chose just to delete it. Anniepoo (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Archealogical category

There is no separate category for archealogical sites/monuments - both are the same as of now. I am revamping the list of archealogical sites/monuments and subsequently a sub category can be created. In the Indian ASI context, sites/monuments are not treated separately - sites are classified as group monuments. I am using an existing category like in other states so that there is uniformity in the listing. This categorization shouldn't impact any of the other listing as this is exclusive. S Sriram 12:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)ssriram_mt

I really don't understand. According to the ASI itself, the list is a list of monuments, not a list of archaeological sites or a list of monuments and sites. So the category should be called monuments, not archaeological sites.

I don't see why it makes sense for the category to have a misleading name. You seem to be saying it's wrong for other states, so to be consistent I'm keeping it wrong for Delhi too. What should be done, of course, is that they should all be corrected.--Sarabseth (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not as such misleading - if you look at the UNESCO world heritage sites, the group monuments or the place is treated archeological. But in ASI context, more than one place(pillar, wall, entrance etc) within the same site can be monuments. I think 'site' classification would still hold good given that we have limited coverage for India related monuments. If you refer the publication by ASI itself, it is quoted as 'site' for most structurals. I had a rough count of monuments as per ASI - it is more than 6000!! Considering the universal use of the term 'site', i followed as such - it can be discussed. S Sriram 11:37, 30 September 2011 (UTC)ssriram_mt

The issue is not "site" versus "monument"; the issue is "archeological site" versus "monument". The fact of the matter is that these are not archeological sites. That is to say, ASI itself calls them monuments, not archeological sites. You seemed to be saying above, yes, I know, but let's use the term anyway.--Sarabseth (talk) 10:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links

A short guide to the dargah Nizamuddin area at Delhi
Maps of the Dargah Nizamuddin area in New Delhi
Photos of the dargah of Nizamuddin (Delhi)
"Inside the Dargah of Hazrat Nizamuddin". LBB, Delhi-NCR. Retrieved 2020-07-21.

Extracted from main article. SerChevalerie (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]