Talk:No. 6 (Violet, Green and Red)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why do people have so little to say about one of the most expensive paintings ever sold? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.73.138 (talk) 23:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because the painting itself has very little effort gone into it to talk about.

Very few drawings by 3 year olds get Wikipedia articles, so the value of this particular piece is the only real noteworthy piece about it. Garfie489 (talk) 12:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about wording, intent[edit]

How can the lead say it was "sold at auction" when cited coverage of the 2014 sale describes it as a "private transaction"? I would be happy to fix, either by deleting the two words or by adding the public sale information, if someone following wants to clarify. Thanks! Johannes der Taucher (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]