Talk:No Way Out (2012)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No Way Out (2012) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 May 2012. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with 2012 in WWE events on 31 May 2012. The result of the discussion was no merge. |
Vandalism
[edit]Needs a protection tag, persistent vandalism--Mjs1991 (talk) 03:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Just requested it. --BarryTheUnicorn (talk) 13:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was no merge. Target article deleted, see WP:Articles for deletion/2012 in WWE events. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 11:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Call for merge with 2012 in WWE events for Notability Small individual pay-per-views are not notable also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul "The Wall" (talk • contribs) 00:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Please be specific about why you feel this is true (based on policy), so others can clearly refute your point(s). The "crystal ball" policy would apply just the same to this information in the article you propose (and have created, which may not jive with WP:COI). InedibleHulk (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment The proposed article for merging is currently being considered for deletion. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2012_in_WWE_events. We should wait to see how that goes first. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Regardless of the ongoing deletion debate, this merge request has be done in bad faith in order to push Paul's idea of merging every WWE PPV in to one page without even discussing it with the Professional wrestling wiki-project to establish consensus to even do something like this in the first place.--Dcheagle | Thunder Up 05:02, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose as "small" individual pay-per-view's can be notable. For instance, championship titles are almost always defended and/or change hands. Also, WWE doesn't usually refer to the year something happened, say for example in reference to a storyline, they usually refer to the individual event. Readers, especially pro wrestling fans, will search by event name and not so much by year. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Edit request on 9 June 2012
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Sogeking123 (talk) 16:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. NiciVampireHeart 16:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 17 June 2012
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- This edition is false, check the source and WWE.com. 189.96.242.64 (talk) 05:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Done - Thanks for the heads-up. The incorrect information has been removed and the editor who added it is on his/her final warning. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 07:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)