Talk:Non-relativistic spacetime
Appearance
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Kudpung (talk · contribs) on 16 June 2017 with the comment: Unsourced. Essay or WP:Original research It was contested by JamesBWatson (talk · contribs) on 2017-06-16 with the comment: Declining proposed deletion & adding a few references. These references are not ideal for the content of the article, but they are certainly enough to show that this is not "original research". |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Old Prods
[edit]@JamesBWatson: When declining PRODs, or contesting them could you please add the template above ({{Old prod full}})? Thanks! (t) Josve05a (c) 23:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Is Kaluza-Klein theory inconsistent?
[edit]"Kaluza–Klein theory was too beset with inconsistencies to be a viable theory."
Does this refer to KK+SM or just KK? According to Kaluza-Klein theory, KK+SM is probably inconsistent ("flounders on a number of issues"), but it makes no mention of KK (GR+EM) itself being inconsistent. Yodo9000 (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)