Talk:North Andrew High School

This page was proposed for deletion by BilledMammal (talk · contribs) on 2 December 2022.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missouri

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article is mislabeled. It claims to be an article about North Andrew, but the history reported is that of the nearby town of Rosendale. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.44.27 (talk) 23:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs major fixes or else merged

The article's history section is nothing but a cut and paste of the same from the Rosendale, Mo. Wiki. Even if it means an overall smaller article, it should focus on North Andrew High School, not the nearby town. This really needs fixed soon. Sector001 (talk) 14:29, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on North Andrew High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070423061706/http://schoolweb.missouri.edu:80/nandrew/location.htm to http://schoolweb.missouri.edu/nandrew/location.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

@Necrothesp: Can you explain what policy-based reason you have for believing this article should not be deleted? BilledMammal (talk) 00:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prodding is for uncontroversial deletion only, as clearly explained in the first sentence of WP:PROD. No deletion of an American high school is ever going to be uncontroversial. Prodding is not a clever way to get around AfD. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you have no policy based objection to deletion? If you have no reason to expect the article will be kept then it is disruptive to remove the tag. BilledMammal (talk) 08:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fear you misunderstand prodding. Please make an effort to understand the process before using it. WP:PROD lays it out very clearly. Oh, and don't accuse other editors of being disruptive. Anyone may remove a prod for any reason or none. Thank you. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then please explain; what reason do you have to believe it will be kept? BilledMammal (talk) 11:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because American high schools almost invariably are kept at AfD. As I said, clearly not uncontroversial and therefore should not be prodded but taken to AfD instead. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with that assessment; on what policy grounds do you make it? If there are no policy grounds to keep then the nomination is not controversial, and removing it is disruptive; doing so is part of the reason that Lugnuts was banned. BilledMammal (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]