Talk:Nuclear Man

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.

Comics: DC Comics / Superman

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Related work groups:
/
	This redirect is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This redirect is supported by Superman work group.

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

This article really needs to be entirely redone. The amount of ands that are strung together are just crap.

And he has this. And he has that. And he does this thing. And whatever.

Seriously, totally crap. The people involved in this article should feel like crap.

Actually, I think the poorly written article is fitting to Nuclear Man, the world's stupidest villian. Monty2 08:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is a disgrace to Wikipedia. I can barely read. I should be able to without getting frustrated by the end.

I tried editing the fragments and I think I improved some of the text but towards the end it just degenerates to a level that is so incomprehensible that I think the only way to salvage this page is to merge it with Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.

I made some attempt to clear up some of the problems but I do not know a lot about this character and so was not able to do a lot about it. There was one sentence which was so garbled I just ended having to leave a ^{[clarification needed]} template because I could not work out what it was trying to say. A complete re-write of this article is probably needed by someone who knows about this character. --Hydraton31 20:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there's a grown up available to do a complete re-write, just merge it. Or delete it and forget it ever happened. Rogerborg (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]