Talk:Nuclear Overhauser effect

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spectroscopy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spectroscopy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SpectroscopyWikipedia:WikiProject SpectroscopyTemplate:WikiProject SpectroscopySpectroscopy articles

Er, don't you think this should be linked to more information on NOESY and TOCSY? I think this should not be merged with the article mentioned. Cos I wanted to learn about NOESY and TOCSY, at least Nuclear Overhauser Effect artcle is around, I didn't miss the boat. Just my two cents worth.

I agree with the previous comment. These two topics should not be merged, and it would be ideal if this NOE stub was expanded. Unfortunately, I am not expert enough on the topic to contribute.

I don't think this article should be merged because nOe is significant enough of an effect and is special enough that it should have its own treatment and article.

-I 3rd the motion.

-I 4th

Major re-write

The NOE page has languished for sometime without significant improvements that include more instructive detail. But it seems the NMR scholars are disinterested in improving Wikipedia pages, at least this one. Nevertheless, the number of page views daily is ca. 100 and many people are directed by Google to Wikipedia, although there are many good on-line resources. I have endeavored to rewrite the page based on standard sources and books. Please proof-read, make corrections, improvements and additions, but try to keep encyclopedic. Tachyon (talk) 13:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

talk Great job! an update was really needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki Chemistry (talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]