From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


It's claimed ([1]) that there is a second Okno, Okno-S near Spassk-Dalniy in Primorsk. Someone has guessed 44°22′47″N 132°56′42″E / 44.3797°N 132.945°E / 44.3797; 132.945 but I can't see much there. Secretlondon (talk) 23:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File:OEK OKNO.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:OEK OKNO.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:OEK OKNO.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

It is a copyvio. It's watermarked and I can find no claim that it is public domain, as claimed. It comes from here ( which we link to. The question is whether Okno is impossible enough to photograph that we could make a fair use claim. Secretlondon (talk) 21:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
I think Wikipedia:Non-free_content says no - "buildings still standing" are explicitly not allowed. I think we should try and get someone to release a free image - the Russian MoD? Secretlondon (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Okno in novosti-kosmonavtiki[edit] ( ( Secretlondon (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Okno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)