Talk:Operación Puerto doping case

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Operación Puerto doping case be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Balance

There are 200 athletes from numerous sports implicated in Operation Puerto. Why is this page only focused on the cyclists implicated in the scandal?

Because it blew up just before the start of the Tour de France, taking out several of the top contenders. —wwoods 02:38, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There're also involved some other top Spanish athletles like Nadal, current squad of Barcelona and Real Madrid etc.

Rafael Nadal has been linked nowhere with the Operacion Puerto. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.155.144.25 (talk) 16:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Not true, Nadal was named by an anonymous source close to the operation in Le Journal du Dimanche in France. He subsequently threatened to sue LJDD for publishing this, but never did. I really hope he's innocent, but there is cause for suspicion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Osjones1 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA said there's no footballers involved. -- Danilot 19:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA tells lots of things ...

Start a FIFA conspiracy theory article then LOL

I've amended the article to note that Fuentes himself has stated that it is unfair to only accuse cyclists of being involved with blood doping, as he also treated tennis and football players.kju 03:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If cyclists make up only 56 of 200 athletes involved, then this page needs major revisions. Rmhermen 01:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree, but we are slightly stymied by the fact that only the cyclist names have been leaked - there has been (as far as I can tell) no leaking of other names. We can only rely on what we can cite as a source, and until the other 144 athletes are named, then we can only talk about cyclists.kju 03:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of a ProTour team was arrested in the beginning of the operation, so of course the focus is on cycling. And the names of the cyclists were released by the police because of French pressure to get the names before the start of the Tour.

I would not put any value on any claim of Fuentes, he has a strong personal interest in obscuring and obstructing the case.--Per Abrahamsen 21:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto

Stupid question probably, but why is it called Operación Puerto? -postglock 15:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reason is that puerto in Spanish means climb (in cycling-related issues).--Xareu bs 07:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh... Thank you very much... :) -postglock 11:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is like militar operations, Guardia Civil uses non meaning names to name his operations, so if there is a leak, no one knows what the operation is about.

Sources

I've standardised the referencing, so we need someone to go through some news articles and find cites for the remaining unreferenced statements before I feel we can remove the "no citations" banner at the bottom of the page. Can someone please hunt down the news reports that list all the cyclists? (and find a few confirmed non-cyclists!). kju 13:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1st of all, the case is open and the judge has decreted that is secret. The names of the ciclist are only known because probably El País bribed someone in the court, but that's all you going to know until some months had passed.

For now is only known that the prosecutors have assured the IAAF that there are not athletes prosecuted. [1]

--Marneus 10:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to go through these tonight for cites to articles, but there is a link to a collection of articles about Operación Puerto on Cycling News. kju 11:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The cleared riders

The status of the riders cleared is a bit confusing. The were apparently cleared by a judge, but that can only concern the ciminal case. And using doping isn't a crime in Spain. The sport world has its own legal system, where the riders hadn't even been charged yet.--Per Abrahamsen 19:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But that is still the current status of the riders - cleared by a Spanish court of any wrongdoing. Basso and Ulrich are being questioned by their relevant national anti-doping body. If the listed Comunitat Valenciana and Astana riders are investigated by their relevant national anti-doping body then that should be noted as well. kju 11:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The translated news report are very brief, and it is unclear what exactly they have been cleared of. What does "wrongdoing" means, legally? Do we know that the "cleared" riders are not being questioned by the Spanish cycling federation? Basso and Ullrich has not been charged yet, as far as I know. At least Basso has been questioned. --Per Abrahamsen 12:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I made some changes to this during the last month but they have been changed back. It is really misleading to use this form of words "cleared of any wrongdoing". They have not been charged with anything. But the files make it clear that there were doping. Have you read the files? If not I can send them to you or upload them and we could link to them. The point is that they have not been charged under any criminal offence, but is this the same as saying they haven't done anything wrong? I don't think so. Hence my previous change which was then removed. --auskadi 09:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect "cleared of any wrongdoing" is a direct translation of a Spanish phrase. And doping isn't illegal in Spain, so being "cleared" by the court doesn't say much. I put in a milder formulation instead.--Per Abrahamsen 09:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current event still?

Just checking to see if others agree that we should take off the 'current event' tag at the top of the page. To my knowlegde the events have all finished, and the matter is, as it were, 'resolved'. Surely the tag remaining on the article is misleading. Also how would I take it off - I'm a newbie! Thanks Sapient Vesta 15:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's current news for like 2 more days. People just checking on this article may do so because of the recent closure of the case: this is news. But it won't be by Friday... Severo 16:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.velonews.com/article/88025 Still a current investigation as of 2/17/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.109.180 (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link back to the original document

As you can see in the page history, this article was originally adapted from [2]. UCI ProTour-Cycling is under the GFDL license, which requires a link back to the original document. Therefore, I am going to put a link. If you want to remove it, please discuss things here before you do it. -- Leptictidium (mammal talk!) 22:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Operación Puerto doping case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061020182044/http://www.velonews.com/race/int/articles/10588.0.html to http://www.velonews.com/race/int/articles/10588.0.html
Corrected formatting/usage for https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070507/ap_on_sp_ot/cyc_basso_doping

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]