|This article contains a translation of Operation Walküre from de.wikipedia.|
The "Epitaph" is nothing but speculation.
Never mind speculation it's bloody Nazi propaganda. Or at the very least I'd suspect its author of having a man-crush on Hitler. Someone sort it out? 184.108.40.206 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC).
a question about chinese version fo operation valkyrie
how can i make a new link for this article from English version to Chinese version .
i had translated a part of operation Valkyrie from this English article to Chinese . i wish that i can make it into Chinese .
I. 元首：希特勒死亡 在政黨中一肆無忌憚之派系領導者已使政權的讓渡得逞, 在爆發如此情況之下，,造成該堅苦掙扎的政權其大後方陷落，並因某些出於一己之私之因素而奪取該政權之權力。
II. 在此一高度危險的時刻 帝國政府已宣告一個軍事的緊急狀態做為法律及秩序的維持，並在同一時間轉移執行權和最高國防軍司令的頭銜；於我。 III. 於此，我下令：
1. 我將轉移執行權及代表權至位於戰區本部之軍區司令。對於位於已佔領的西部區域之國土戰爭，儲備軍司令將歸屬於同步指派之最高司令下。對於位於義大利之西部戰線最高司令；對於位於已佔領的東部區域之西南戰線最高司令；對於位於丹麥和挪威之軍團最高司令及東部地面國防軍司令其指揮的各別區域，其權利將轉移至國防軍司令。 2. 執行權之所有者有權對下列人、事、物進行管制：
a) 所有國防軍階層及單位，包括武裝禁衛隊、帝國勞工團和工團組織及其區域命令。 b) 所有屬於帝國、德意志、各省和自治區之公開授權。（特別針對全部司法警察、安全警察及行政警察）； c) 所有政府機關任職者、國家社會主義德意志工人黨之子部門及其相關社團； d) 運輸服務及公共設施。
3. 全部武裝禁衛隊將被整合至軍隊中，即刻生效。 4. 執行權之所有者必須負擔秩序及公共安全之維持。特別是需要確保：
a) 通信設施的防護措施， b) 帝國元首保安服務的消滅措施。
任何對於強制軍事力的反抗採取極度殘酷之方式予以瓦解。在此攸關祖國存亡危急之秋，國防軍之統一及完整紀律之維持是至高無上的必要條件。這是為何我使其成為陸軍、海軍及空軍全體司令的責任。借此使之能支持執行權之所有者肩負起授予給他們的困難任務，並賦予他們充足的法理意義在其處置，且保證給予他們麾下之次級階層必要的服從。無論帝國是否得已被拯救，德意志的士兵將依靠他的力量和態度面對這個前所未有的歷史性任務。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Create the page on the Chinese wiki, then add the text "[[zh:PAGE NAME HERE]]" (no quotes) to the bottom of the page, replacing the words "PAGE NAME HERE" with the title of the page on the Chinese wiki. --V2Blast (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
The German translation is wrong, it's "Operation Walküre", not "Unternehmen Walküre". Just check the German Wikipedia article (which has the title "Operation Walküre") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 12:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
It seems to me like his article is more about the July 20 plot than the actual operation. I would suggest restructuring the article to talk more about its original intents and history and THEN how it was subverted in the attempt to verthrow Hitler. I dislike Hitler as much as anyone else, but it seems to me that the article is a bit off topic. Plus, the text of the declaration at the end is a bit confusing. Was that the order itself? Or was it perhaps an explanatory note accompanying it? Sadly, I know too little about the topic to rewriite the article myself, but I definitely find its structure confusing. erget —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erget2005 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Beyond immediate takover from Hitler long term goals of the plotters should be mentioned(occupation of central Europe, demanding recognition of Nazi territorial conquests in the East keeping up war with Soviets and Poland and so on).--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)