Talk:Orthodox Marxism

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merging Classical Marxism and Orthodox Marxism

Somebody placed a merge tag on the Classical Marxism page, but I don't think that there is any reason the merge the well strucutred and developed Classical Marxism article with the Orthodox Marxism tab. The Orthodox Marxism article states that Orthodox Marxism is the version of Marxism which emerged after the death of Karl Marx. This therefore could form a sub-section of the Classical Marxism page. I have therefore switched the tags around to suggest that Orthodox Marxism be merged into Classical Marxism. Although I don't necessarily agree with this I am happy to leave it open to debate. JenLouise (talk) 04:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think they are two different things and should be kept seperate. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

where are the quotations for this, wikipedia is propaganda —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.55.122.95 (talk) 04:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are two different things but this is the one that ought to have the greater development as it covers more actual stuff (e.g. the Marxist praxis in actual state experiments after the time of M&E). Although the components exist in separate articles there doesn't appear to anything thing corresponding to what this should be. It's practically a stub at this point. Lycurgus (talk) 17:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kautsky was a revisinist decended from Bernstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.225.200.133 (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kautskyism

I added some key points from this article:

http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/620/macnair.htm

Kjk2.1 (talk) 02:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Rooke quote

I included a quote from an article by Mike Rooke in the "description" section, as the current entry lacks external sources. An anonymous editor removed it, with the following justification, but I disagree and replaced. If other editors agree with the criticism, fair enough. The anon ed said "the claim lacks citation and the quote is out of context, the article itself differentiates Orthodox Marxism from the communist movements after 1919)". BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]