Talk:Othona

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Classical C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

East Anglia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Othona community

A couple of sentences were added recently on the Othona community. While the group draws its name from the Roman fort, think link to the main subject of the article doesn't seem very strong. Anyone else got an opinion on this? Richard Nevell (talk) 09:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added this. I think it is worth describing somewhere, and this article seemed more natural than Chapel of St Peter-on-the-Wall, where it is also mentioned. The community is based in the buildings immediately to the north of the chapel (compare the aerial view on their homepage with Google Satellite View). Is this within the Roman fort area? That would strengthen the case for this being here. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]