Talk:Oxford–Cambridge Arc
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 13. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Oxford2Cambridge.com is just a holding page - is linking to it useful when it doesn't have any content? Caliston 08:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- True. Feel free to delete in such cases. I did. --Concrete Cowboy 23:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
RFC: change of name to current usage.
[edit]The term "Oxford-Cambridge Arc" appears to be so last century, dahling. The National Infrastructure Commission uses "Cambridge – Milton Keynes – Oxford corridor". Per WP:Common name, that is what we should be using. Unless anyone objects to this proposal in the next two weeks or so, I shall move this article to that name. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- As no-one has objected, I shall do the move. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 18 December 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Oxford–Cambridge Arc (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Cambridge – Milton Keynes – Oxford corridor → Oxford-Cambridge Arc – The Cambridge – Milton Keynes – Oxford corridor is the old name of this project. The name has been changed back to the 'Oxford-Cambridge Arc' and therefore the title of the page should reflect this. All instances of corridor in copy have been updated. Alexnenglish1995 (talk) 13:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Citations showing evidence of a name change are needed before this is even considered. "All instances of corridor in copy have been updated." What copy? of what? where? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I see that England's Economic Heartland is using the Arc terminology,[1] but is that because they never changed to corridor or because they've reverted? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Please see the following resources as hard evidence that the name of the project has indeed been reverted to the Oxford-Cambridge Arc:
- The Government's own policy paper declaring the project: The Oxford-Cambridge Arc: government ambition and joint declaration between government and local partners [2]
- Another Government paper setting out the strategy of the project: Oxford-Cambridge Arc Local Industrial Strategies [3]
If you would like any further resources, there are plenty more where they came from!Alexnenglish1995 (talk) 10:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, accepted. I have updated the Request to Move so that it says that "Oxford-Cambridge Arc" is the intended target, I don't know of any serious alternatives.
- I Support this move. (Just for the closing administrator).
References
- ^ Road improvement schemes submitted to Government 13 August 2019
- ^ https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-oxford-cambridge-arc-government-ambition-and-joint-declaration-between-government-and-local-partners
- ^ https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/oxford-cambridge-arc-local-industrial-strategies
- Comment: shouldn't there be an endash instead of the hyphen in the proposed title? There is no place called Oxford-Cambridge. HandsomeFella (talk) 07:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, well spotted, but it should be an mdash. (Oxford—Cambridge). I have updated the RtM accordingly. The redirect with a hyphen will need changing too. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- No, it should be an en-dash as HandsomeFella said, per the MOS: MOS:ENBETWEEN. Dekimasuよ! 15:12, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.