This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Please add a lead paragraph at the beginning explaining what this list is a list of and a link to the original article -- otherwise it looks like these Papyri might not meet the WP:GNG. Some of them should have references to other sources. Yay Papyri articles! I just want to make sure that they're done right. Thanks! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert(talk)16:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out. I've been working on the table for so long, and I was so happy to finally get through it, that I popped it out into article space without even considering a lead paragraph. I put a couple of sentences in. Let me know what you think. I might put a little more in later. I took the liberty of adding a section title, although these articles don't get a whole lot of discussion. I hope that's acceptable to you. These articles don't tend to get a whole lot of discussion, but maybe someday that will change. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For notability, I'm relying somewhat on WP:LISTN. This is mildly sketchy, because I don't have a source discussing these actual 48 papyri as a group, but since most of them were republished at some point (see the "other numbers") column, most of them are notable enough on their own, I believe.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
