Jump to content

Talk:Pakistan–Singapore relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

I think the whole subsection should be removed. It is really about China-Pakistan relations. LibStar (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its a multilateral issue (China, Pakistan, India, USA, and most importantly Singapore) in which Singapore PSA holds key-importance, as PSA is the key contractor of the Gwadar port. Pakistan and Singapore involvement in the Gwadar port is primary, whereas China, India and USA involvement holds secondary importance. (Jalal0 (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]
the subsection I've tagged contains no comments from Singapore officials. The info is adequately covered in other articles. LibStar (talk) 01:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well in that case merge it with China-Pakistan relations article. (Jalal0 (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Merged done --Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Pakistan–Singapore relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]