Jump to content

Talk:Parc naturel régional d'Armorique

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Parc naturel régional d'Armorique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Age & height of Monts d'Arrée

[edit]

There is an un-referenced statement that these were created as mountains 600 million years ago - and hence 'older than the Alps' - what does that mean? Some of the rocks which form these hills were not even deposited as sediments until 150 million years later in any case. I'll remove this line or tweak if I can find evidence that the Brioverian rocks that form a part of th Monts were indeed part of another mountain system way back. cheers Geopersona (talk) 07:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There also seems to be some confusion around heights. The on-line version of the IGN topo maps (https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/carte?c=-3.880278,48.416667&z=0.000316906&l=GEOLOGY.GEOLOGY$EXTERNAL:OGC:EXTERNALWMS(1)&permalink=yes) gives a spot height of 385m for a southerly top of Roc'h Tredudon and of 387 for a northern top. Roc'h Teevezel further southwest is given a height of 383m, the same value as Tuchenn Kador. Menez Mikel (Chapelle de St-Michel) is given 381m (though the highest (semi-)natural surface could still be higher if compromised by a structure. Geopersona (talk) 07:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geology

[edit]

I've started a new section with this title and removed an existing (unsourced) line (The Monts d'Arrée hills are one of the oldest geological formations in Europe. They were created as mountains 600 million years ago, thus they are older than the Alps.) since it appeared to be based on a misunderstanding (see above also): the rocks may be late Proterozoic but that does not mean that the currently existing 'mountains' (hills actually) that they form are of that age. cheers Geopersona (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]