Talk:Particle chauvinism
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment was in article!
[edit]"(The writer of the previous paragraph appears to be referring to the fact that the Higgs field is unlike any other known field insofar as it is a scalar field, the only known physical example of a scalar field in nature. The presumed irony, then, would be that the most likely intermediary for matter as human beings know it and whatever it is that the dark sector consists of, ends up being a 'thing' which is very unlike familiar matter.
While this would indeed be ironic, if true, I'm not sure whether it constitutes an accepted viewpoint rather than original "research". Should this heading exist?)"
The above was part of the article. I know next to nothing about particle physics but I do know comments belong on the talk page. Anybody with knowledge on this subject should consider himself invited to edit the relevant info from above into the article. Dutchy45 (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
A page for this really?
[edit]Do such stupid ideas really need their own wikipedia page? This is like something somebody thought of while they were high, and there is hardly anything to say about it except by the people pushing the idea. This page should be merged with wiki/Relativism, if not deleted.2001:480:91:FF00:0:0:0:16 (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)