Talk:Pass system (Canadian history)

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Indigenous peoples of North America High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weird formatting/punctuation & impact on readability (Wikipedia manual of style)

Does anyone else find this article's use of em dashes to be distracting/hard to follow? For example, in the very first sentence:

The pass system was a Canadian federal government Department of Indian Affairs segregationist policy, first initiated on a significant scale in the region that became the three prairie provinces in the wake of the 1885 North-West Rebellion—as part of a series of highly restrictive measures—to confine Indigenous people to Indian reserves—newly-established through the numbered treaties.^{[1][2]: 162–5}

I've never seen anything punctuated like this before, though apparently you can use them in place of en dashes for some things. Wikipedia's manual of style doesn't seem to explicitly forbid using em dashes for interjections, but neither does it say that you can - though, the manual does make it clear that pairs of dashes should never be used more than once per sentence.

Anyway, is there some reason for this? I wanted to ask before editing because I also can't immediately remember seeing anything cited like this^{[1][2]: 162–5} except when quoting passages.Xanthos IV (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]