no consensus, 3 October 2014 (UTC), see discussion.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Skeleton infobox rv as per WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)): “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia’s reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.”Quis separabit?07:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
is Patrick's tweet worthy of mentioning in the article
Honestly, I think using terms like “reporter” or “journalist” to refer to this man is an insult to the entire profession. It would be like calling David Irving a historian of the WW2 era, or the Deutsche Physik movement a branch of physics on par with cosmology and quantum gravity. [1][2][3] These are just a couple examples of his commentary from the last few days. I know Wikipedia isn’t supposed to push a slanted point of view, but it would be slanted to _not_ point out just how fringe Howley’s writing really is, and certainly outside the boundaries of anything that could be called journalism. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:AB44 (talk) 22:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
