This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
I found this article through a word search of "Scott Paltrow." He wrote a very good article on the SEC. But I think that what's happened here is that a big section has been pulled out and is now about half the article on this particular SEC commissioner. Hey, I'm definitely sympathetic. But I don't think you can make half the article on this issue, right? JohnnyB256 (talk) 16:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Although Atkins is mentioned just two times in passing in the Portfolio article, about half his bio here is devoted to an extremely WP:UNDUE section on "Stonewalling." Wording such as, "Atkins appears now to have benefited in his management at SEC," is POV at best, libel at worst. William H. Donaldson's article had a similar problem, and it was tagged with WP:UNDUE, WP:NPOV, and Template:BLP dispute. In this case, I say it would need many more sources, and possibly a devoted news article on the subject to warrant a couple sentences mentioning this in the section on his SEC tenure, but as it stands now, I'm removing it. It's archived [ here], should someone chose to read it, trim it down, and add more sources for notability.—DMCer™15:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reading the lead I was led to believe that Atkins is a money manager of some kind, primarily. But the infobox says he's a commissioner at the SEC. If he is a commissioner, that is a pretty important piece of bio info that should be included in the lead. I dont want to fix this because I really dont know anything about Atkins, I just came here to assess the article. But I suggest someone either add that he is commissioner into the lead, or remove it from the infobox.Simplysavvy 07:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplysavvy (talk • contribs)
