Talk:Phil Ligrani

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 7 February 2017 by Voceditenore.

ligrani (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Notability and other tags

I have removed the notability tag as the verified position he holds would be a pass of Criteria 5 WP:PROF. However, this article is nothing but a résumé with very poor referencing (much of it almost verbatim from from one of the sources. I have tagged it accordingly. Voceditenore (talk) 09:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have now trimmed and re-written this. The article is no longer orphaned. All information in the article can be verified by the inline citations. Thus I have removed those maintenance tags. I have left {{third party}} as the refs all come from the institutions where he taught. I have also removed {{autobiography}}, which should only be used if the article still contains puffery and unreferenced self-serving claims. I do not believe it does now. Note also while the subject may have edited this current article, it was not created by him. It was created in 2013 by someone who created three articles on faculty members at the subject's former university, Saint Louis University [1]. Voceditenore (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Voceditenore. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the {{third party}} tag, recently removed again by User:Ligrani with the edit summary: Removed third party comment because I have fixed the problem. Here are two new references which address this issue. Please note that press releases such as this are not independent and are therefore not third party references. This one is basically press release based as well, both are about the wind tunnel project with a brief mentions of Ligrani as head of the project. Voceditenore (talk) 19:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]