Talk:Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition

Prestigious[edit]

User:AustraliaJessuper, the word "prestigious" is considered a WP:Peacock term on Wikipedia, which we do not include because they are opinion based terms that overinflate the importance of the topic. If you have reliable third party sources that specifically call it as such, then you are welcome to say something along the lines of "[publication/person] has called it prestigious," but you can't make that claim yourself. Discant X 12:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DiscantX: I have amended the article to conform to the relevant style requirement. -AustraliaJessuper (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AustraliaJessuper: Looks good, glad you found some sources. Only problem now is that it suffers from citation overkill. We don't need 45 references for the exact same point. A few would suffice. The sources you have provided seem good though, maybe they can be used to expand the article on points other than this one? Discant X 06:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Awards at the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court [edit]

There is a draft article for the list of awards at Draft:Awards at the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court. As this could spin off some of the content from here, please chime in there and edit. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the bulk of this page is about the awards, a separate page seems unnecessary. Chensiyuan (talk) 04:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The awards page adds information on team members and coaches for finalist teams, but I'm not sure that level of detail is appropriate. The best memo details are essentially the same for both pages. The best oralist details that have been added, well, again I'm not sure that level of detail is appropriate. Manderiko (talk) 05:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

if we take a cue from featured lists of similar stuff, including the additional details in the proposed draft does seem like overkill. ie, keep as is here. Rangtengpa (talk) 01:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]