Talk:Pioneer H

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Smithsonian Institution Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Accuracy dispute

Yes, I'm disputing the accuracy of an article I wrote.

The article is essentially sourced entirely off Wolverton's The Depths of Space. However, I emailed the National Air and Space Museum, because I found a discrepancy in two of their pages describing the artifact. One said it was a prototype, the other said it was a replica built from spare parts. The historian who responded showed me scans of the original paperwork leading up, which clearly describes it as being a replica assembled after the fact.

Take the article with a grain of salt. -- Cyrius|✎ 1 July 2005 14:42 (UTC)

The issue has been sorted out, with the assistance of Dr. James Van Allen and Dr. Roger Launius (Chair, Division of Space History, National Air and Space Museum). The craft in the Smithsonian is not a prototype. However, it is constructed from flight-qualified spare parts, and was considered flyable. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:48, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Probe

I recall in the early 80s there were some vague references to a lost NASA probe. The story went something like a Pioneer probe that had been intended to use a slingshot of Jupiter to complete the Saturn/Uranus/Neptune grand tour before Voyager but due to a basic mathematical error had been sent the wrong way. The details of Pioneer H seem to chime. 212.42.8.253 17:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are likely thinking of Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 probes - Pioneer 11 was first to use Jupiter's gravity for course correction/change as well as acceleration to Saturn.

Voyager 1 went past Saturn's moon Titan - which would not have permitted a Uranus or Neptune flyby. Voyager 2 visited all 4 gas giants.

I would highly recommend reading the "On-line" version of Mark Wolverton's Book on the Pioneer program !!

Greg Beat 03:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article

I just wanted to say that I enjoyed reading the article a lot. I regret that a perfectly flyable spacecraft designed for navigating space still rests inside a concrete building here on Earth. The quote from Van Allen at the end (1 AU) is incredibly sad. Atilim Gunes Baydin 23:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements

Overall I feel that this is a good article on the sort of 'lost history' that needs to be covered. I've managed to run down a copy of the orignal Ames report which I've linked to the article and I've had a few thought on possible improvements. One thing I intend to do personally is double check all of the links to make sure they are still current.

Two other things that might be nice to have would be trajectory diagrams and a simulation of the view from the spacecraft camera at Jupiter flyby. I lack the software/skills to do the latter, so perhaps someone else might want to look into this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Graham1973 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pioneer H. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/dsh/artifacts/SS-pioneerX.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]