Talk:Playas de Rosarito Municipality

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Playas de Rosarito Municipality article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tijuana (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tijuana, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TijuanaWikipedia:WikiProject TijuanaTemplate:WikiProject TijuanaTijuana articles

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page neutrally moved, but certainly no prejudice against future move discussions. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:55, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Playas de Rosarito Municipality (Baja California) → Rosarito Beach Municipality – Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC) This article was moved to Playas de Rosarito Municipality (Baja California) with the rationale that this is English wikipedia, however, this is the official name of the municipality not the name of a beach,. First of all this move was not discussed and second of all the official name is not always the title of the article. Common examples include in cities the article title is never Cidade do São Paulo or Villa de Madrid but São Paulo and Madrid. Others include counties; Mexico is located at Mexico, not the United Mexican States, or rather the Spanish language version of that title. To the best of my knowledge common English usage shows Rosarito Beach Municipality to be the common name.08OceanBeach^S.D. 09:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed was moved by you without any disscusion from the its official name to Rosarito Beach Municipality, however, the accurate name in English is Rosarito Beaches Municipality, the municipal seat is colloquially known as Rosarito Beach but the name is just Rosarito, the wikipedia articles should use their real names and not their colloquial names; others examples of articles using its official names in a foreign language are the Quebec Regions,--Jcmenal (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was moved because the city article was moved to the same title. Yet Wikipedia's stance is to use the common name, to assist the reader in locating the article. As far as the Quebec articles are concerned, the names of those regions are also the common names. Within reason, on English Wikipedia common English usage should be used on article titles. 08OceanBeach^S.D. 21:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral (almost). In the discussion to move the city's page to Rosarito Beach last year, I noted that there may be no common English name for the municipality. Both can be found in similar numbers in English. So to me, either name is acceptable. However - in either case, the "Baja California" should be removed, since it's unnecessary to disambiguate here. Dohn joe (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rosarito Beach Municipality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]