This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article had lain largely undeveloped and unimproved. In copy-editing I have Wikified, removed any weasel words, loaded terms, blogese and any unsupported claims that existed. I have added cite requests for unsupported assertions. I have added a ‘more refs’ template, and a References section with one ref to his marriage.
The Career listings were inadequate. There was no cited evidence that he was involved in any of the red-link productions, or that those productions exist. The Film Section (removed) held an erroneous link to ‘Rainman’ – it should have been ‘Rain Man’, but there is no evidence that Haza was involved in this film – in the IMDb database, , or any of the databases listed in the Wiki Rain Man article... perhaps he was a non-notable extra? The listings blue-links remaining either have evidence of Haza involvement, or have a cite request for evidence. If any of the removed listings are reverted, do this with adequate linked evidence.
Haza is probably notable, but this article did/does not do him justice. Could an editor with good knowledge of Haza’s life and career extend this article? - everything cited/referenced of course, and with no trivia or personal opinion.