Talk:Prince William Forest Park
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prince William Forest Park article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Still a stub
[edit]This article has two sections and three photos. Is it still really a stub? Thoughts? Mmoyer 03:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I checked the WikiProjectVirginia quality scale. Since this article has some good sources, some photos, and substantial content, I think it is at least a "Start" quality, so I upgraded it from stub to start. Smiller933 (talk) 02:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
sasquatch
[edit]I removed this, because honestly it hardly seems appropriate.
1) NESRA (the sasquatch people) have nothing to do with the park, and there is no NESRA presence (bigfoot viewing facilities, guided tours, etc.) in the part.
2) This is such a trivial part of such an extreme fringe that it doesn't bear mentioning. I'm all for including minority viewpoints and little known facts in the wikipedia, but even by bigfoot hunter standards, this is minor to the point of irrelevance. If they claim to turn up any kind of evidence, or draw some media attention, it should be reinstated by all means.
Categories:
- Start-Class Virginia articles
- Mid-importance Virginia articles
- WikiProject Virginia articles
- Start-Class Protected areas articles
- Low-importance Protected areas articles
- Articles of WikiProject Protected areas
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Stub-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance