Talk:Principes

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Principes article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Principes has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 15, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
November 9, 2016	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved

Current status: Good article

Military history: European / Italian / Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Additional information:
/
	This article has failed an A-Class review.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Principes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Looks great. I've read through it a few times and fixed 2 minor link errors. The sourcing is good, too and the only concerns I have are the ones that hit me in these reviews as well:

Caps...sometimes Principes is capitalized, sometimes not. Make it consistent.

Done

Italics, I think it would be best to italicize the Latin words, throughout.

Done

Again, great job...fix these and I'll have another look later on.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 20:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the suggestion of someoen else I have restructured the article, is the new structure fine with you?--Serviam (talk) 18:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm passing it, reorg is even better than before!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 03:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]