Talk:Puuc

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica

Mexico

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Possible article split

Nice revision work on the article, Chunchucmil. At some point it will probably prove useful to split out the different scope for Puuc into separate articles, say one on the region and the other on the arch. style. Similarly for Rio Bec.--cjllw | TALK 07:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, glad you liked the work. I just added a bunch of references for those who want to research the topic further. I would suggest leaving all of the different meanings of Puuc within this article, but separating them by sub-headings. As I'm not a geologist, I'll leave the discussion of the Puuc region's geology to someone else. Any takers?? Chunchucmil 19:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I suppose that until such time as either sense accumulates enough info here to separate out, we can hold them all here per your suggestion. Do you know of any references which examine or concentrate on the Puuc region (Maya sites) as a whole? For the geology, I recall coming across at some point a Mexican govt resources site somewhere that had a few papers on it, will see if I can find it again.--cjllw | TALK 21:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best resources to use for filling out this topic would be by Nicholas Dunning (see the references on the article page). He's a cultural geographer and has conducted extensive studies of the entire region (both archaeological and geological/environmental). Of course, for a great catalog of nearly every important site, you can't beat H.E.D. Pollock's work (also in the references).Chunchucmil 19:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointers, Chunc. Might see if I can track down a copy.--cjllw | TALK 04:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Height of hills?

This seems a significant omission. I have no idea, reading this, whether the highest hill in the area rises to 300m or 3000m. 86.149.0.249 16:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, they are hills, not mountains ;-)

A valid point though- IIRC their maximum elevation is somewhere around 120–150 m asl, just as soon as I can track down a definitive source I'll look to add it in. Thanks for the prompting, though you or anyone else would be more than welcome to track down the info yourself. Cheers, --cjllw ʘ TALK 02:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Puuc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20010726184710/http://www.yucatan.com.mx/especiales/rutapuuc/ to http://www.yucatan.com.mx/especiales/rutapuuc/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]