Talk:Pygmy owl

Birds Mid‑importance

Pygmy owl is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Wingspan

The article states that pygmy owls typically have a "wing span of about 86 to 105 mm". Unless they're the size of dragonflies (and relatively small ones at that!) this can't possible be right. Should it be cm? Pburka (talk) 02:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it further, 105 cm also seems dubious. If the maximum body length is 19 cm, a 105 cm wingspan seems quite long. Pburka (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all discussion of the size (and distribution) of the species. It was all unreferenced and clearly much of it was incorrect. Pburka (talk) 03:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chestnut owlet is not in the list

Why is no there a Chestnut owlet (Glaucidium castaneum)? --SanoAK (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's fourth from the last in the list. Pburka (talk) 16:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank You for help, but no, both are different species Chestnut-backed owlet and Chestnut owlet. --SanoAK (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oops. The similarity of both the English and Latin names misled me. Pburka (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]