Talk:Pyongyang Declaration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article obviously needs a listing of signatories. Unfortunately, DPRK seems to keep the full list of signatories secret, but various partial lists are floating around on the net, with varying degrees of verifiability. --Soman 16:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, remember Wikipedia:Verifiability. I'm inclined to think the reason for hiding members list is the fact that hardly any of groups of more than 200 members signed it. Look bradleft.org, there is a special label for pro-Kim commies.--Constanz - Talk 16:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

By provide sources to claims. 'Hoxhaists' hate the WPK, and consider the North Korean govt as more or less fascist. They don't recognize DPRK as socialist. --Soman 16:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You would recognise?(I do). Good old Soviet tradition: everything that is against our communist sect may be determined fascist!--Constanz - Talk 16:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pyongyang Declaration[edit]

As soon as I figure out how, I'm going to create a link and article for the "Pyongyang Declaration" between Japan and DPRK. Epthorn (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pyongyang Declaration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]