Talk:Q-Notes
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tagging re:source
[edit]I placed the article issues tag at the top page. The basic issue is that the article is entirely sourced to the magazine itself, which is problematic since there's no way to confirm the notability of the information and it's not NPOV. All the information (other than basic facts) should be sourced to reliable, third party sources. --Mosmof (talk) 01:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Improving article
[edit]Following talk I have added some tags to sections needing help with possible neutrality issues and added extra references and citations. Feedback and assistance would be greatly appreciated, especially as I have a possible conflict of interest with the subject matter. Thank you. Matt (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Newspapers articles
- Low-importance Newspapers articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- Start-Class Charlotte articles
- Low-importance Charlotte articles
- WikiProject Charlotte articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles